Saturday, April 21, 2007

His greatest innings...

5 November 1998 Board Fires Brian Lara And Carl Hooper

5 November 1998 West Indies tour hangs in the balance

10 November 1998 Tour saved after talks end West Indies brinkmanship

11 November 1998 Jimmy Adams out of South African Tour

10 January 1999 Lara's future as West Indies captain on the line

19 January 1999 Windies face troubled future

19 January 1999 Whitelash: Lara says WI in tatters after 5-0 drubbing

4 February 1999 Captain's boots too heavy for Lara

8 February 1999 South Africa creates history

14 February 1999 Why Lara should be impeached

20 February 1999 Lara to lose top job, reports paper

23 February 1999 Lara's Two-Test Trial

24 February 1999 Lara's laughable reappointment

25 February 1999 Hooper may miss out

26 February 1999 West Indies lose 'Chanders'

5 March 1999 Redemption time

Australia v West Indies (1st Test) - Scorecard

13 March 1999 Sabina farce

``Once we could beat the world, man. Now it's time to suck salt.''

Given this context, given the history, given the pressure the man was under,what happened next is a testimony to the man's character and his great ability to play the most defining innings of this generation.

Australia v West Indies (2nd Test) - Scorecard Match Report

                                                                R   M   B  4 6
*BC Lara c Healy b McGrath 213 468 344 29 3
16 March 1999 Thank you Jamaicans, thank you Lara
---

His 277 may have been more commanding, his 153 more thrilling. The 375, 400 and 501 more towering but for me this glorious innings defined Brian Lara.

Thank you Brian Charles.
---
(West Indies in RSA - Articles)
( Australia in the West Indies - Articles)
(

The long walk back..

WICKET! Lara run out 18 (West Indies 173-3) Oh no. That's a sickening way to go. Samuels drives Broad to mid-on, sets off and then sends Lara back, and Pietersen hits the stumps with a precise, underarm throw. That's a farcical way for such a great career to end, and Samuels has 'pantomime villain' daubed all over that oversized head of his. Lara looks pretty devastated on his way off, and not a million miles from tears. There is one last wave of the bat, but he looks tired, and weary, like Hank in A Simple Plan. When you carried a series of islands for nearly two decades, your body takes a hell of a strain. It is the right time to go, but - please - not like that. Sickeners come no more definitive.
And over at the Sightscreen, a Requiem.

What a catch!!

WICKET! Smith c Collingwood b Flintoff 61 (West Indies 168-2) Paul Collingwood has just taken one of the greatest catches I've ever seen. Seriously: I'm not doing Heineken-fuelled hyperbole. It was similar to the famous catch to dismiss Matt Hayden at Bristol in the 2005 NatWest Series, only better. Devon Smith flailed on the up at Flintoff and Collingwood at backward point, diving to his left at point, went up with his wrong hand, the right, and clawed it down. It was if he had a telescopic arm. And the best thing of all about it is that, because it was Collingwood, you were hardly surprised that he held on. Stunning.
Very similar to the leaping catch he took to dismiss Hayden off Harmison in 2005 but he had more ground to make in this one today. Breathless stuff
29.3 Flintoff to Smith, OUT, what a catch - a remarkable, gravity-defying catch! Smith slashed seemingly over Paul Collingwood at backward point who sprung up, swivelling as he did so, taking the ball high in the air. A quite brilliant example of athleticism and hand-eye co-ordination

DS Smith c Collingwood b Flintoff 61 (135m 106b 6x4 0x6) SR: 57.54
MARVELOUS!!

How do you spell C A R N A G E

Two words - Chris Gayle

7.6 Plunkett to Gayle, SIX, and again! Gayle plants his feet, swings through the line and absolutely creams Plunkett over long-on for a quite enormous six into the Walcott stand, bouncing into the concrete steps and bouncing further into the stand
7.5 Plunkett to Gayle, SIX, and this has gone! Gayle's blowing in like a storm here, just lofting this with tremendous power over long-off
50 from 47 balls
7.4 Plunkett to Gayle, FOUR, how on earth has he done that? Gayle gave himself room outside leg; Plunkett followed him, and it's shorter, and Gayle deliberately plays it over the slips down for four. Extraordinary shot
7.3 Plunkett to Gayle, FOUR, good grief, that is absolutely hammered by Gayle. It was a terrible delivery from Plunkett - short and wide - and Gayle just smacked it through extra cover

8th over: West Indies 62-0 Gayle is looking pretty majestic (45 off 25 balls), and clatters Plunkett for 22 in that over. First he slaps four through extra-cover. Then he plays an astoninshing shot: he made room outside leg stump so Plunkett followed him with a short one, and Gayle just checked it over the slips for four. And he rounds off the over with successive sixes, both smashed imperiously down the ground. "Chris Gayle, welcome back," says Tony Cozier. Awesome.

A thoroughbred retires. A colt checks in

Brian Lara's last game in International cricket. Stuart Broad's first in the West Indies.

It will be interesting to see how both of them go.

Friday, April 20, 2007

Today

has three broad themes

1. The Indian Team Selection for Bangladesh

Board bullies rule: Sachin, Sourav rested
Selectors succumb to pressure
This happens only in India!
‘Rest’ or ‘drop’, idea probably was horses for courses
Selectors will have to get used to taking orders from BCCI babus
Boiling point
Swept under
‘Where’s the motivation?’
No logic in persisting with Sehwag
One-dayer rest for 30-plus

2. The Brian Lara retirement

A career of personal glory, with team on the slide
Lara's last song to be played at full house
‘None like him’
Brian Lara has timed his decision to perfection
Brian Lara announces retirement
Bye, bye Brian Lara
Cricket: Brilliant career founders on off-field conflicts
Ever the entertainer, Lara leaves his mark at 11,953 runs
Good bloke? Maybe not. Great bloke? Definitely
Playboy, prima donna and phenomenon
Heir pressure
A lone fighter


3. Sundry pieces

Ranji captains meet, ask for points revamp
West Indies coach faces uncertain future
Lights, action, no cameras
Turning dreams to reality, Tiwary has his hands full
Tiwary — a steady rise
I have the confidence to perform’
Kumble is an expert, I am a learner: Chawla
Radical reconstruction need of the hour
Dav decides to step down
Time for real change
‘Solid khush ho gaya’
Bose well-placed for England

Cosmetic change, short-changing & compromises

Pradeep Magazine is none too thrilled with the team selection

Here is the article -

This is a sell-out. If the Indian selectors have any pride left in them they should quit and tell the Board that from now on, they should pick the team themselves.

How did a man of Dilip Vengsarkar's stature not walk out of the meeting and later, keep his calm in a press conference where one bizarre explanation after another was being given for strange selections. Even more baffling was not selecting a vice-captain, instead leaving the choice of Rahul Dravid's deputy to the captain and coach.

First, the Working Committee decides to name the captain of the team themselves -unprecedented in the annals of India's history - and then it gives a directive to the selectors to pick a "youthful team".

Following that, the selection committee promptly decides that Dinesh Mongia, at 30 years, is young and Virender Sehwag, nearly 29, is not old enough to be dropped.

What has saved Sehwag is his great match-winning hundred against a team like Bermuda and what has not saved Sourav Ganguly his place in the team is his six half centuries in the nine ODIs innings he has played after his comeback to international cricket.

And has Sachin Tendulkar been penalised for speaking against Greg Chappell or for his lack of form? No, it has to be for speaking out against the coach, who, if one goes by the Board's thinking, is the greatest thing to have happened to Indian cricket.

So great has been the coach's influence on the team that within 18 months of his taking over this role, Indian cricket may have hit rock-bottom, but his methods have given the Board a great insight into how to improve Indian cricket.

Perhaps they are right. After all, how low can one sink? From now on, India can only improve their ranking. The Working Committee will then deserve all credit and may be they should then take a leaf from what happens in tennis and appoint a non-playing captain.

There are many in the Board who understand the game better than the players and no harm in giving one of them this job. Their own Working Committee can then ratify all these decisions.

One can well understand this policy of "youth" and also the logic that Bangladesh will be the best place to groom youngsters. But apart from one or two players, which youngsters have been picked? None.

It is a team full of compromises only because the Board wanted to keep Tendulkar and Ganguly out of the one-day team. Mr Chappell must be smirking wherever he is in Australia.

Rahul Dravid, one believed, was a great captain-statesman in the making. But after all that has happened in the past month, I am afraid his silent acquiescence could well have him go down in history as someone who played a crucial role in the liquidation of Indian cricket.

Take a deep breath Sunil Gavaskar...

now exhale.. Repeat.

"After destroying India, Chappell may do the same to Oz"

If you cant access the link - here is the article
--

One thing is for sure. Whoever wins the World Cup, there will be a huge turnover of coaches.

John Buchanan had announced in 2005 itself that the 2007 World Cup would be his last assignment as Australia coach. Whether he is interested in coaching a national team again or is not yet known, but all he has to do is hint that he is interested and he will be flooded with offers.

Among the other three semifinalists, Tom Moody, Sri Lanka coach, may want to look at other opportunities, though he has refused to entertain or consider any offers till the end of the Cup.

On the other hand, another Australian, Dav Whatmore, has spoken on record of his interest in coaching India.

In fact, when India was looking for a replacement for John Wright, Whatmore had offered to break his contract with the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and come over to India. That did not impress the BCCI, which quite rightly felt that if he could walk out of a contract with Bangladesh midway, what was to stop him from doing that to India if, say, Australia offered him a contract?

The other coaches coming under the hammer are England’s Duncan Fletcher and West Indies’ Bennett King.

Fletcher, who just quit, has been the longest-serving coach, having been in office since 2000, and has had some success with victories over Pakistan and Sri Lanka overseas, apart from the Ashes win in 2005. Thereafter, somehow it’s been downhill.

Almost every former England captain and player wanted a change not only in the coach, but also the captain and the chairman of the selection committee, for England’s poor showing.

Bennett King has blamed the West Indies’ cricket structure for his team’s failure. He has been at the job for four years and apart from the Champions Trophy win in 2004, West Indies has done nothing of note during that time.

If King thought the structure was not conducive to producing a good team, did he bring it to the notice of the authorities or has the realisation struck him only now, as the Windies limped off the World Cup radar?

South Africa and New Zealand are the only other Test teams with local coaches and both Mickey Arthur and John Bracewell have done exceedingly well with their teams, so there may be no changes there.

Pakistan will be looking for a new coach after the unfortunate demise of Bob Woolmer, and Greg Chappell left India before India left him.

When Chappell took over, there was optimism all around that Indian cricket would be ready to challenge Australia for the title of the best team in the world.

Instead, at the end of his tenure, Indian cricket is down in the dumps with a first-round exit in the World Cup, and is as fractured and divided as seldom before. The most promising of talents, as recognised by the ICC Cricket voting panel, has lost his way and nobody of note has come through in this period.

The batting, which should have flourished under the guidance of one of the best batsmen, has looked tentative and has lost the spark that made the Indian team a must-see. Despite all this, and him saying in an interview that the BCCI is run like Zimbabwe, the BCCI is reportedly offering him a place as a consultant to the National Cricket Academy.

It’s never easy sacking somebody, however incapable and inefficient, but to give another job which deals with the future of Indian cricket, makes one wonder if we will ever get out of the inferiority complex syndrome.

In the meantime, comes the news that Chappell is going to head the Australian Cricket Academy. If true, then it could be the best thing that has happened for world cricket.

Now even Ireland has a chance of beating Australia sooner than later.

--

Now I dont know about you, but Sunny G has, of late, started resembling Don Quixote..

Whatmore quits as Bangladesh coach

report here.

FIC ( future India coach) ?

Huh!!!

Selectors Pressurised By Captain Rahul Dravid To Retain Beleagured Virender Sehwag – Dravid Not Comfortable With “Seniors”

please tell me Sehwag did not make it to the team because of this -

Take Virender Sehwag, Pepsi’s new endorser, who till late last year was drinking Coca-Cola.

Interesting selections..

for the five extra bowlers who will make it to the Kolkata camp.

Ranadeb Bose gets lovely shape on the ball.. Yomahesh and Sharma are tall, hit the deck types. Pankaj Singh's profile lists him as a right hand bat ( HS 74) and right hand medium fast. Pragyan Ojha is a left arm spinner.

It is interesting that there are two left arm spinners in the camp - Rajesh Pawar and Pragyan Ojha. Two left arm spinners could only mean one thing - Bangladesh has 3 left arm spinners in thier ranks and the Indian batsmen haven't really covered themselves in glory playing that variety of spin in recent times.

If Yomahesh and Sharma represent the future and Ojha is in the camp to provide batting practice, what use Ranadeb Bose and Pankaj Singh?

And isn't the Indian team selection for Bangladesh a little like that? Neither forward looking nor heavy on experience - a little nip here, a tuck there and everyone gets to crow about "youth" or "experience" - depending on which side of the divide you are on.

Look at the teams again

ODI squad: Gautam Gambhir, Robin Uthappa, Virender Sehwag, Rahul Dravid (capt), Yuvraj Singh, Mahendra Singh Dhoni (wk), Dinesh Karthik, Manoj Tiwary, Dinesh Mongia, Piyush Chawla, Sreesanth, Munaf Patel, Zaheer Khan, RP Singh.

Virender Sehwag gets a new lease of life. This, when his test batting form has been better than his ODI batting form ( unless you rate a hundred against Bermuda as a pointer to form).

Three openers have been selected - If Virender Sehwag is a fixture ( and I dot see why not, what with the skipper backing him), Gambhir and Uthappa have the 3 ODIs to make an impression ( wonder how much playing time either will get).

Two wicketkeepers ( MSD and DK) make the trip - overkill?

4 pace bowlers have been selected - how much playing time should RP Singh realistically expect?

Manoj Tiwary and Piyush Chawla lead the young brigade - against that you have Dinesh Mongia on a comeback. And Zaheer Khan.

Test squad: Wasim Jaffer, Dinesh Karthik, Rahul Dravid (capt), VVS Laxman, Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly, Yuvraj Singh, Mahendra Singh Dhoni (wk), Anil Kumble, Sreesanth, Zaheer Khan, VRV Singh, Ramesh Powar, Rajesh Pawar, Munaf Patel.

One specialist opener. And Dinesh Karthik. Unless Rahul Dravid wants to make the opening position his own. And I wont be too surprised if he does. How else do you accommodate Sachin, Saurav, VVS and Yuvraj in the team?

7 bowlers for a two test set.. How much playing time will VRV Singh get? If we go three pace two spin, bye bye Rajesh Pawar. If its three spin two pace - guess who the fall guys will be.

Also, the middle order is the same old tried and tested bunch that failed us in Durban and Newlands. No new faces there.
--
Like the spare bowlers, the Indian team is neither here nor there - there is no direction or any indication thereof.

PS:- Where is Md.Kaif? And whats this nonsense about Yuvraj being the "anointed vice captain"? Puhleazeee.

PPS: - Siddharth Monga on the Tiwary and Pawar selections
Anand Vasu - here.
Interesting point Vasu makes - Ajit Agarkar would have made the team if Rahul had his way.. I have never been flash about Rahul's One Day capataincy and now I am getting to the point where I am beginning to question his cricketing judgment.

Kumara Sangakarra

gets feisty and makes a few telling points.

What I like best about this article is the confidence the man has - in himself and his team. And the argument itself - coherent and biting without being churlish.
--

Please read..

this - Worth your time.

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Say what?

43.1 Syed Rasel to Sarwan, 1 run, It should have been a run out! Rudi Koertzen didn't refer it upstairs. Pity. overpitched on the leg stump line, flicked to midwicket. Saqib swooped on the ball and fired in a direct hit. Sarwan is just short of the crease but there was not a huge appeal and Rudi didn't go upstairs. hmm..
After a couple of replays the commentators deliberated on whether anyone appealed for the run out at all. By the third replay, it was visible that Saqib had indeed appealed. The conversation then turned to the intensity of the appeal and that the Bangladeshi appeal was not intense enough.

For the record, Law 27 states

Law 27: Appeals. If the fielders believe a batsman is out, they may ask the umpire "How's That?", commonly shouted emphatically with arms raised, before the next ball is bowled. The umpire then decides whether the batsman is out.

Nowhere is it suggested that if the decibel level exceeds a certain level will the appeal be considered.

And then there is the small matter of "excessive appealing" - a Level 1 penalty that carries an official reprimand and/or a fine of up to the equivalent of 50% of the Player or Official’s match fee.

Untitled

The Baroda Cricket Association (BCA) has appointed Makarand Waingankar as Chief Executive Officer to streamline its activities.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Nice!!

Mohnish Parmar hit a return catch to Dinesh Mongia, who cleverly realised that Patel was backing up too much. Mongia made to drop the ball and effected the run out at the non-striker's end. With no player appealing for the catch the umpires had no choice but to rule Patel out.
--
Anand Vasu on the Indian team selection for BD.
--
Who will play the Twenty20 finals is the 64000$ question.
--
MP beat Bengal in a low scoring game. It will be interesting to read on how Manoj Tiwary led his team in this game; if there are any match reports to be found.

PS:- Thanks Prabu for pointing out this piece of creative writing

Tamil Nadu’s left arm spinner Vidyut (three for 14), son of former Indian leg spinner and TV commentator Laxman Shivaramakrishnan, K Vasudeva Das (two for 20) and U Mahesh (two for 29) then bowled a tight line and length to restrict Haryana to 111 all out off 19.4 overs.
Laxman Sivaramakrishnan was born on Dec 31, 1965.
Sivaramakrishnan Vidyut was born on Dec 3, 1981.

Go figure.
--
PPS :- Sounds familiar?

Do paisa!

Recriminations in full swing in Old Blighty - Richard Hobson, Christopher Martin-Jenkins, Mark Nicholas, Mike Selvey, Lawrence Booth,Andy Bull, Lawrence Booth ( again), Stephen Brenkley, Angus Fraser, Derek Pringle, Paul Nixon and Simon Hughes. chime in.

This sets up the English summer nicely - three teams; two with possible new captains, all three with possible new coaches, all three struggling to put their house in order after a dismal World Cup. Should be fun!
---
Bob Simpson on coaching in India, with a little Chappell thrown in. And older article - here.

Here is a thought - The Australian selection committee that oversaw the Australian renaissance comprised of Lawrie Sawle, Greg Chappell and John Benaud.

Lawrie Sawle, per Bob Simpson, was the fairest Chairman of Selectors he knew. John Benaud is amongst one of the foremost thinkers of the game ( see here, here , here , here, here and here).Geg Chappell is a brilliant skills coach.

Despite this setup, and Bob Simpson as coach, Australia still managed to toss around the Baggy Green to all and sundry.So, it was not as if the whole turn around was planned to a T.

Factor in the rebel tour of 1985 and the question that begs to be asked is - to what extent were the selectors hands forced - to pick a young squad and stick to them?

So to what extent was Greg Chappell influential in the Australian turnaround and the next time the "Greg was selector when Oz turned it around" come around, can we temper it a little?

Also, what are the lessons India can learn from the Australia ( wrt selection and criticism and everything in between)?

PS :- Now that I think about it- here are some parallels - with my favorite cricket team Mumbai. Who started the season without any of the Team India players or Vinod Kambli or Vineet Indulkar.

They may not have faced a rebel tour, but losing Karsan Ghavri, Sairaj Bahutule and Nitish Shetty's retirement mid-season comes close.

Not quite Kim Hughes, but Nilesh Kulkarni had to make way for Amol Muzumdar.

Like Chappell, Dilip Vengsarkar idominates conversations on Mumbai's turnaround on account of being the Chairman of the Selection Committee, but what of Abey Kuruvilla, Milind Rege and the other selectors?

New coach, new captain, young team, turnaround. Lessons anyone?
---
Sponsor deals angers players - in Australia.

Who controls the players more? The Board of Control for Cricket in India or the sports managers/agents? Vijay Lokapally on what the BCCI and sports managers say.

Mo Money Mo Problems!!!!

---
The latest installment of Graeme Smith's Diary is available :)

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

The more things change ..

A debate... revisited.

4-0-10-5

read the analysis of a 17 year old slow left arm spinner in a Twenty20 game.

Iqbal Abdulla, take a bow.

Update :- DNA has more.

"The overpowering Mumbai show eclipsed an all-round show by talented, gutsy Amit Mishra for Haryana."

Amit Mishra -Now thats a name from the past. Good leggie with a decent legbreak and googly. So here is a thought - given that Harbhajan may not make it to Dhaka, will it make sense to have Amit Mishra as the third spinning option along with Kumble and Powar against Bangladesh?

Not only will he get to play Test cricket in a less pressurized situation, but he will also get time to interact with Kumble, both on and off the field - should be a good learning experience.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Today..

Ian Chappell has a go at the Sri Lankans for not fronting up their best team. Personally, I think his argument rings hollow in light of the fact that it is the Australians who have made the "rotation policy" fashionable.

Elsewhere, Makarand Waingankar talks of Shastri and the Indian team and rejuvenating the Indian team.

Anand Vasu on the Twenty 20 Tourney - here and here.

First the English. Now the Proteas. Cheers.

Mumbai lose. Mumbai's cricketing culture in decline. I need a drink!

Please do visit

here

The Atheist analyzes

Tossing

Read worthy :)

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Akash Chopra deserves a post

all for himself - very interesting read.

PS:- The Hindustan Times site appears to require registration and login - in case you are unable to access the above link

An appreciation..



The kid made all the right noises leading up to the tournament. His batting ability is beyond doubt. What was going to be of interest was how he held his own with the senior stalwarts breathing down his neck . Also of interest is his temperament in a high pressure situation that is the Twenty 20 - as batsman, bowler and captain.

In his first game as captain, he led from the front scoring an impressive 50 odd and marshaling his troops adroitly.

Manoj Tiwary - Take a bow.
--
IMHO, from whatever I have read about him and what little I have seen of him, Manoj Tiwary is ready to step up to don the India Test cap. He is a shoo- in for the One Day side, but I believe that he has the right attitude, temperament and wherewithal to do pretty well in the Test arena.

The only thing he will need to guard against is not so much the money and the fame that will come his way, but the hype.

Mahendra Singh Dhoni is a classic example of a player with some potential who has been so caught up in his own hype that he plays the game to match the hype, not the situation.

Manoj Tiwary has both the cricketing skill and the nous to play the game at the highest level. Here's hoping the BCCI mentors him well.

PS :- MS Dhoni should NOT be the first choice keeper for the England tour. He is way too one dimensional and will be found out, with gloves big and small, in the late summer English conditions

PPS:- More Tiwary

Tiwary sets up Bengal win