The West Indies had been heavily criticised for lacking pride and discipline earlier in this match, but that has not been the case over the past two days. Starting with Darren Sammy's seven wickets on Saturday, they have confounded most people's expectations by knuckling down to the point where they have an outside chance of levelling the series.Derek Pringle 11/06/2007
West Indies are mercurial as a side can be, bouncing merrily this past month between total incompetence and steadfast obduracy.We saw the best of it at Lord's in the drawn first Test and we have seen it in the second innings here, led brilliantly by the diligent, vigilant, unflappable Shivnarine Chanderpaul, who after four and a quarter hours will resume on 81, his third successive half-century of the series, and abetted by Devon Smith (42), Runako Morton (54) and Dwayne Bravo (49). On this occasion the tourists' batsmen have shunned the flash flippancy that has characterised too much of their cricket and taken responsibility instead.
Mike Selvey at Old Trafford
Monday June 11, 2007
Yesterday's cricket contained two collectors' items, firstly involving Steve Harmison bowling straight, and secondly a series of West Indians at least declining to use their bats as though they were auditioning for the conductor's job at the Last Night Of The Proms.
How West Indies missed him during that flaccid surrender at Headingley. He had batted for four-and-a-half hours to set up the draw at Lord's, and he made another sheet-anchor half-century in the first innings here - an innings that only ended because of the wickets tumbling all around him. The spark for West Indies' fightback may have been provided by Darren Sammy's seven-for on Saturday, but Chanderpaul is the slow-burning wick that has kept that flame alight ever since.
It wasn't a solo effort by any means, although who else could have inspired Runako Morton's monument of self-denial in the afternoon session. Morton's natural game was best demonstrated by the furious swish he took after being given out lbw for 54 - it was the shot he had been gagging to play all innings, but had somehow found the willpower to resist. Instead he had been leaving the ball expertly against the quicks and spinners alike - and replays of his dismissal suggest his judgment didn't entirely desert him.
Andrew Miller at Old Trafford June 10, 2007
The underlying theme of all the reportage of the fourth day's play of the Third Test between England and the West Indies has been the levels of discipline shown by the Windies in the Test in general and the fourth day in particular.
Ganga's leadership has been about instilling discipline and nurturing a good work ethic. Sarwan considers himself a gambler who is willing to take risks.Maybe the fourth day was a one off, maybe it is too early in his captaincy for Ganga to leave his imprint on the team and for us to sit in judgement, maybe I am clutching at straws - but I think that Darren Ganga could be the best thing to happen to West Indies cricket in a very long time......
Ganga, at 28, brings a decidedly more mature approach than Sarwan, who will turn 27 in June. Not that age is the decider, but their temperaments and experiences have been starkly different. Ganga has been bumped in and out of the West Indies team, sometimes inexplicably, but he has been stoic and resilient and has always tried to work out his problems, though it has affected his confidence.
11 comments:
Hello Homer
the mother of breaking news!
FORD HAS DECLINED TO COACH INDIA!!!
i can help but laughing loudly on BCCI...what a laughing stock they have become to the world to the point of embracement. soon enough calling BCCI to someone will become synonym to Idiot, inept, laughable bimbo...adjectives can go on and on...
aye Pankaj.. read about it and havent stopped laughing since... The players have lost face because the guy they backed opted out.
So they are in for a tough contract negotiation.
The BCCI has lost face. First they could not salvage the TV deals with ZEE and Neo Sports and now the richest cricketing body in the world cannot get a coach.
So the players will have to play 20 additional ODIs this season :)
in near future...they will talk like this...
"sir please appoint me! i am bit BCCI but will make it up with some experience"
"he will never learn he has become complete BCCI"
"i lost the contract...everything was going smooth till someone called me BCCI..."
ha ha...:))
i do think this can be am "item" at laughter challenge on star one!
still laughing...
Declining the post is a big mistake for Ford. If he was to continue at kent, it was no business for him to come here and do all this drama. More than BCCI, he has fooled himself. A big cheat.
I feel the foreign obsession should go now and one of Shastri or Gavaskar should step in showing guts to keep aside their media commitements.
Or BCCI could even nominate Emburey as Ford s replacement.
Moreover what the heck was Chandu doing in exposing the tailenders to face the hungry English bowlers. Aghast and insane. Selfish and ridiculous. Throw him out of the team.
A chance gone to create the history and turn around the dipping fortunes of WI.
hay super
i agree to you little...very little...
but let me know what you will do when
you cant bring in your team of professional to help you out
you are given only a year to do miracle with "this" team...
you are reviewed every tour...
add to it the "professionalism" our "special" BCCI posses...
and not to forget the egos of our "super heroes" which has to be/needs to be pacified every now and then...
i bet you would have start thinking...
specially when you are already enjoying a good fortune...
Man picture this : You go in for an interview to a company. You give the interview, you get selected, you accept the offer. But your current employer gives you counter offer, because he doesnt want to loose you. What do you do, you reject the new offer from new employer. And you stick with old company. Does that make the new company worthless ?
And with the Chappell experience, anyone would be skeptical about new coach. Its right to have an 1 year review period and then judge him. Every one has a probation period right in corporate world. Then why not ford ?
Come out of the pessimism mate, despite all buffoning of BCCI, India is yet a better cricket team than whats made out to be. These "super heroes" were darlings of every one s eye just till the WC began and with one WC everything changes ? I dont think so.
John Wright worked in a way more worst than Ford would have been as you suggested. Chappell and Ford did have specific contracts, Wright had none untill 2003 WC success.
Yet he was the most successful coach, not because he kept low profile or he was reviewed every series, but he was a man of few words and had strict work ethic.
And BCCI has done enough to rope in best of the support staff to keep players fit. If players like Patel lie about it, then even GOD cant help.
There are some flaws in the coach selection process, but not everything is pessimistic as is made out to be. Ford should have had guts to refuse the job there itself when he came. In the first place why did he come, thats questionable.
John Wright didn't have an existing contract, nor was the appointment of coach turned into a 'tamasha' then, nor were many people interested in what pay Wright was getting.
Time has changed and media has grown into wolf by now. But BCCI is certainly to blame for this. They couldn't have been more unprofessional in this this search.
Mr Superunknown, please answer a few questions if you think everyone is making BCCI a scapegoat:
1. Why was there no advert for the post?
2. How else did BCCI think they'd find a coach? Did they expect that merely on knowing that there was a vacancy for Indian coach, the whole world will come running to them?
3. What were the criterias for the coach BCCI was looking for?
4. How could the appliant know about those, without them being mentioned anywhere?
5. Why did BCCI announce that Ford was the Indian coach, before he had given his consent?
6. Why so many restrictions were put before he could even agree for job?
There are many such questions, which I don't bother to pose now.
BCCI have reduced themselves to a joke, alright! But what'll happen to our Indian team?
Awritey then.... Ford's not coming, neither is Emburey.
So now the question is - what are the qualifications we are looking for in our coach?
A person who shall not leak dressing room talks to media, one who would not have a king sized ego, one who would be willing to talk mildly to the players and not be in a rush to write off or bring in the new players on basis of 1 or 2 good performances.
That for a coach.
Reg John Wright, he did have a contract post WC'03. Agree or not, I dont care, I am not sure Chandan if you have bothered to read his autobio, but if you read it, you d find the facts.
As for the official advert : Does it matter ? If they had given an advert what was guarantee they would have got a person who wouldnt back off ?
And Ford, Whatmore were influential candidates, not like our own Patils and MadanLals. They had been sent feelers. Thats what we call word of mouth. John Wright came this way, Chappell came this way. But Chandan your thoughts are pessimistic to the core, to which I dont abide. Things are not that worse as you always make out to be.
So it hardly matters for me if you agree or disagree. Cos I always look at the silver lining of the cloud rather than the dark part of it.
You wont even accept Wright turned around the fortunes of Indian cricket and they started winning overseas better than any point of their past history
For the record, BCCI said they have offered Ford the job and it would be upto him to let them know how soon he can join the team. There is a big difference between an offer and a joining. A big difference.
Dont worry about Indian team. A few series wins and ....
Post a Comment