India win by two wickets and a ball to spare - England 316/6 India 317/8
Following the loss at Old Trafford, in course of a conversation with Sfx, I opined that it will be a huge test of character for India to bounce back after that loss.
The loss was huge as it set India back a long way in the 7 match series. It was also heartbreaking given that India had given it all and had still ended on the losing side. The manner of the loss was demoralizing in that India could not finish the game from being in a position where they could not lose.
In terms of holes, I had serious doubts if India could climb out of this one.
Then Headingley happened. Content in the knowledge that the series would be lost there, I was off, gallivanting around around the country.
I heard of the Headingley result first. Then I read about the game. Finally, I saw it. But that did nothing to convince me that India had turned a corner.
Until today, that is.
Set a humongous 317 to get by England, India kept its wickets and its nerve to take the series to the decider at Lords. And some effort it was too.
Barring a couple of overs when Gambhir could not get the ball of the square and Tendulkar was cramping up and later when Dhoni was all edges and no middle, India kept the momentum going.
India began the match well, faltered in the middle but did enough to ensure that the result went their way.
Questions though, remain. Of the middle and late over bowling, of the fielding and the captaincy. Yuvraj, Sachin, Yuvraj for the 48th, 49th and 50th overs ? This, when Ramesh Powar was yet to bowl his quota of overs. As was Agarkar. Where was the logic in that?
India showed character, the downside to which is that it took a rocket up their backside in the form of a prospective series defeat by England before they have started to show the kind of cricket they are capable of.
And are Ian Gould, Nigel Llong and Peter Hartley the best that the ECB can conjure for an International ODI series? Gould's decisions or lack of cost India Old Trafford. Peter Hartley's charity allowed Owais Shah to get to his maiden hundred. And Hartley nearly fluffed again when he nearly did not call for the third umpire in the Paul Collingwood run out incident.
Gripping series this may be, but shouldn't that be because of the contest between bat and ball?
And what about Paul Collingwood? I would love to see what the Match Referee has to say about his open show of dissent following his run out.
James Anderson got away with a shoulder barge at Headingley, maybe Mr Fat Arse will too.Which will be a travesty.
Wednesday, September 05, 2007
Sixth ODI - India versus England, The Brit Oval
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
Congrats Congrats ! :)
But Yuvraj 5 sixes.....30 runs in Last Over ...soo scary lol .
Homer @ You havent mentioned Robin anywhere...i think he showed his true class..inspite of not playing a single match...inspite of being an opener , he performed really well tht too at no 7 .
Bravo Bravo !
Wot abt Tendulkar ?
a great win!! augers well for the future if team india...with the injection of youth...we could be deadly combination...
but we should not loose prospective here...
to me enough is enough and Agarkar should be playing his last match for india...
you cant give momentum back to opposition with this type of bowling (with just 4 main bowlers) he should have been the leader of bowling pack by now and for all his wickets he is leaking too much runs and last over fisaco was resultant of dravid having lost all confidence on AA...
coz with him we are neither progressing ahead nor he is showing any bit of consistency...its better we look for future in pace bowling too and move on...
tubyy @ words are not enuff for SACHIN TENDULKAR...:)
very true straight point @..if tomm someone picks up the history of Max no of 4's given OR..the worst last over ever blowled OR....player responsible for losing a match due to his bowling....i m sure AJIT AGARKAR's name will be written in GOLDEN LETTERS :)
I wonder y selectors r still backing him....whn guys like Sreeshanth , RP Singh , Ishan Sharma , Pathan etc.....are sitting idle :O
Well said Agarkar should go. Even after 192 ODIs he is not able to figure out to bowl at the slog overs, then better give chances to new and upcoming players.
Jane,
I haven't mentioned the batsmen because everyone chipped in.. And in their own way, contributed to India reaching 317,
tubbyy, straight point and Jane,
Agarkar should go is fine and dandy - who becomes the 5th bowler? Munaf Patel is hors de combat and RP Singh is a #XI batter. Given that Agarkar has some ability with the bat, he is being persisted with in this series.
Going forward, if Sehwag and Pathan rehabilitate quickly, they become automatic selections - giving the team balance and depth, batting and bowling.
Agarkar has potential with bat, this is a thing we have been listening since ages. Alas this is overstated stmt. he is past his sell date...
Ashu,
Thanks for your comments.
I dont disagree that Agarkar has been below par but understand the Indian problem/psyche if you will - Agarkar represents the best willow wielder amongst the bowlers ( his 7 ducks notwithstanding) and India will be loath to go into a game with 2 left arm seamers. Given that the tour party is limited to 15, what are our options?
Cheers
Agarkar's ability with the bat is Cricket's biggest myth!!
Amit,
Agarkar has a 100 at Lords, something neither Sachin Tendulkar or Rahul Dravid can boast of :). But I agree, Ajit Agarkar has done enough to book his place out of this team post the England series and it will take something humongous for him to find his way back.
Cheers,
The worst part of being Agarkar is he is not ready to don the responsibility of the seniormost pacer in the country. Only Srinath and Kumble have taken more wkts than him in the ODIs, but unlike the duo, he could never be relied to take wkts in a crunch situation.
He gets deflated soon. The match at Old Trafford, he bounced back with tremendous grit taking 4 wkts, that could have rubbed on any other bowler and he would hv improved leaps and bounds. However this lad from Sachin s Ranji team which s my favourite team too, is in diff league.
It should strike Agarkar with a strong degree that despite having 2 overs to bowl of his quota and a reputation of best bowler in closing stages of an innings in the country, he was overlooked by skipper to bowl the 48th and 50th over.
I bet he wont even improve now, that his career is almost at a dead end. T20 provides him a slim hope of revival, but given his track record, MSD wont risk him....
H Natarajan dissects the Agarkar enigma.
Post a Comment