Uncle J Rod , in his summation of the first session of the current Test between Australia and the West Indies, wroteThen Michael Clarke did what Michael Clarke does, fails when he comes in and the score is under 150.
So, with a little help from Statsguru, I ran the numbers
Scores 50 and above
149/4 - 151
234/4 - 91
171/3 - 73
128/4 - 141
100/3 - 91
155/3 - 56
407/4 - 56
257/4 - 124
206/3 - 135*
216/3 - 145
285/3 - 71
139/3 - 73
117/3 - 81
241/3 - 118
199/3 - 110
Scores 25 and below
108/4 - 17
191/4 - 5
101/4 - 17
33/4 - 7
445/4 - 7
71/4 - 1
135/4 - 20
147/4 - 8
146/3 - 8
187/3 - 22
66/3 - 11
186/6 - 7
281/3 - 25
152/2 - 5
101/2 - 5
258/2 - 14*
257/2 - 5
50/3 - 19
5 out of 7 hundreds with the score reading 200 or more.No substantial score when the team score below 100.
The Uncle has a point!
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Putting the Uncle's theory to test
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Yep. :)
:)
Yours was a bit more thorough than mine, but I did write this the last time this bothered me.
thorough work,
with the batting of the gent of cos.
the post as u say was inspired from Uncle JRod's post.. and in my opinion you could hv taken it further to include his bowling
UJ,
There is Steve Waugh and there is Michael Clarke - NSWelshmen both, but as different as chalk and cheese.
Including their batting :)
Cheers
Ankit,
Welcome to the blog and thanks for your comments..
His part time left arm "spin" does not qualify :)
Cheers
Your right about them being different, one of them came into one of the worst teams in test cricket and had to fight for everything, the other comes into the best and thinks because he got a haircut and a wife he should be made captain.
Post a Comment