Tuesday, August 05, 2008

The unravelling of a team.

"Maharashtra is a huge state," says Ajay Shirke, the Maharashtra Cricket Association (MCA) president. "And it's not feasible for the talent in the districts and small towns to come to us; we will have to go to them with the game. We realised that for the last two-three seasons we have been working on that."

is that why

Ajay Shirke, an entrepreneur from Maharashtra was busy striking a deal with Lawson, the West Indies fast bowler capable of flustering the likes of Australia. In India, Maharashtra has taken the lead in this regard having got Darren Holder as their director of cricket last year, and 'importing' Munaf, Sairaj Bahutule, Sridharan Sriram, Chandrakant Pandit by getting them to shift allegiance from their original states.

and

Bangladesh left-arm spinner Enamul Haque Jr and Sri Lankan medium-pacer Sujeewa de Silva will join the Maharashtra squad for the 2008-09 season. Haque and de Silva will replace Sairaj Bahutule and Munaf Patel who have not renewed their contracts. The selectors were keen on choosing international professionals since other states could be interested in domestic players, Maharashtra Cricket Association president Ajay Shirke, has said.

This, from a team that

Maharashtra have surprised all so far by securing 15 points from four games - with seven debutants and several unknown players, they have outplayed every team they've come up against. They started the season without veterans Sairaj Bahutule and Hrishikesh Kanitkar, who were not back to full fitness after injuries from the previous season.

and

Maharashtra went into the first match of the season with seven debutants. Some had not played much outside their districts, most were torchbearers for towns that hadn't produced first-class cricketers earlier. Unlike a few other states, Maharashtra hadn't been impoverished by the ICL (only a couple defected) but had decided to ease out a few players for a few fresh ones.

Left to themselves in unknown territory, they've held their own. Halfway into the Ranji season, and they've been the side that's made everyone take notice. They entered the first match without Sairaj Bahutule and Hrishikesh Kanitkar, their two most experienced hands, but nearly grabbed first-innings points against Tamil Nadu. Had rain not intervened, a victory was on the cards. They went on to beat Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh before stunning Mumbai, at the Wankhede Stadium, for the first-innings lead.

I am sorry, but this is plain wrong.. For a team that, for a substantial portion of last season, was a contender, to unravel in this manner is nothing short of criminal.

Vikram Solanki and Kabir Ali did not do the trick for Rajasthan. Why should Maharashtra be any different?

8 comments:

Cleaning said...

Very well argued, Homer. Awesome

Anonymous said...

excellent post as usual Homer... you kicked that guys butt big time

Homer said...

Thank you Mr Rajaraman :)

Homer said...

Thanks Scorpi :)

Soulberry said...

Tell me something Homer - How do you view foreigners playing in India domestic and vice versa...say Indians playing in English county, SA domestic and Sheffield Shield (if anyone finds a spot)?

No specifics, just your general views on this issue.

Homer said...

SB,

I dont mind having foreign players in the Ranji Trophy but I would like them to be first choice for the low budget and/or Plate League teams.

If the intent of getting foreign players in is to better the level of the game, shouldn't they be drafted by the teams at the lower end of the table?

Then there is the question of salary - if the disparity between the salaries of a foreign player to an Indian player is too great, I would like the salary cap to be brought in.

Also, in Maharashtra's case, I find it ridiculous that they have not been able to retain existing talent while at the same time they look outside for help!

Cheers,

Soulberry said...

If the intent of getting foreign players in is to better the level of the game, shouldn't they be drafted by the teams at the lower end of the table?

Then there is the question of salary - if the disparity between the salaries of a foreign player to an Indian player is too great, I would like the salary cap to be brought in.



Agree with the first point. Problems - where will weak teams find the funds to pay overseas players?

Which brings to the second point. Agree again about pay parity to an extent...but if you are keen on getting an overseas player, you have to take into account the cost involved (for the player) in translocating himself for a season in comparison to local players.

I also agree Maharashtra has been peculiar in its player enrolment.


Are you ready, Homer, for the new Ranji season? :)

I'll go this one without Gambhir, Sehwag and Ishant and am hoping Amit Misra can finally drop the prejudicial scales from the selectorial fishy eyes.

Anonymous said...

SB,

All associations get paid equally by the BCCI - it is a question of fund management - if they cant manage the money, they should be penalized.

All set for the Ranji season SB - this time our boys will not only humiliate Delhi but humiliate Delhi in its lair.

Joy!

Cheers,