AR: Now to the question that you have picked as the best one that has come in for you this week. Sandip from the United States wants to know: should MS Dhoni be made India's Test captain? He says that Anil Kumble has been captain of the Test side for a few months now and Dhoni has been the captain for the one-dayers and Twenty20 matches for a similar amount of time. It is very evident that Dhoni has matured tremendously in a short span of time. Is the time ripe now for the Indian selectors to politely replace Kumble with Dhoni as captain of the Indian Test team for the upcoming series against Australia?
GB: My answer to that is simple: no. There has never been a wicketkeeper-batsman who has been a successful captain in Test cricket over a period of time. Occasionally a wicketkeeper has captained an odd Test match. But to do everything, like dealing with the press, wicketkeeping, and batting day after day, match after match is too difficult.
Let me explain to you: stand in front of the mirror, go down on your haunches and come back again. That is what the wicketkeeper does, for 90 overs a day, for 540 balls, plus the throwing and the extras, and so you go up and down about 600 times a day. Most of you will be lucky if you can do that 50 times in front of the mirror. It is very tiring. On top of that, you have the mental situation of having to work out in your head between balls who is going to bowl, what will be the field positions, and still catch the ball if it comes to you.
What has happened in the past when wicketkeepers were captains is that they were concentrating too much on where the fielders should be and who is going to bowl next and so they started dropping catches. I have great respect for Dhoni and I think he has done a wonderful job in one-day cricket. He probably could captain in Tests too but it's just that his position as wicketkeeper makes it all difficult when you add it together.
In one-day cricket, you only have 20 overs or 50 overs to keep wickets - three and a half hours at most to keep wickets. Then he gets a couple of days off. In Test cricket there are no days off. It lasts for five days solid. You have done one innings and then you have to do a second innings. Then you probably get three days off before another Test match because administrators are shoving Test cricket and one-day cricket in as much as they can. Now on top of that, they are shoving in as much Twenty20 cricket as they can. So it is going to get very difficult. It is not that Dhoni can't do it mentally; it is not that he isn't up to the challenge. I think he is, he is very knowledgeable, but it is his position as wicketkeeper that makes it very difficult to encompass captaincy and keeping wickets well.
11 comments:
I'm with you on Dhoni and Test captaincy, not only because it will be tiresome, but there's something about his style of captaincy that I feel may not fit in the Test scheme. Test matches are about patience and thought apart from good cricket. It's about believing in your solid batsmen rather over time than the flashy ones. Gambles involving throwing rookies at the deep ends may not work here. Sehwag should take over after Kumble.
same here.
vmminerva,
Thanks for your comments and welcome to the blog..
the one other thing about Dhoni is that if he were to give up the gloves in Test cricket, he is not a good enough batsman to bat in the top 6.
Sehwag as Test captain is an interesting proposition - until today,I would have considered it ( until he fluffed the Md Nissar Trophy, that is).. But more fundamentally, the Sehwag captaincy raises this question - Dhoni as Sehwag's captain in ODIs and Sehwag as Dhoni's captain in Test - sustainable?
Cheers,
Homer, thanks for the warm welcome. Yep, Dhoni isn't solid enough to make it at #6 on batting merit. That's a interesting question you ask of split captaincy. But then again the game has changed so much over the last 5-6 years, that there seems to be a need for specialists in each form of the game. While this might seem a logical explanation for split captaincy, there will no doubt be egos clashing. This takes us to the heart of the crisis we are facing now - the lack of quality talent - a fact I've just ranted about at my blog quite often. There hasn't been a decent batsman recruit to the Indian side since Ganguly and Dravid. Once we solve this problem, we might be able to find a captain who can lead in all forms of the game.
vmminerva,
I dont think the issue is so much about talent as it is about management.
Managing Dhoni's workload is what the entire argument boils down to.
One way of mitigating this would be to have two entirely seperate teams, one for Tests ( led by Sehwag) and the other for ODIs and T20 ( led by Dhoni).
Karthik can be the Test wicket keeper and while there may a slight overlap in personnel ( Badri, Sharma, Raina, Ishant), for the most part, we have a deep enough roster to get two teams of XV members each..
Its a radical proposal, but then again, it is not as outrageous as it sounds :)
Cheers,
on the contrary, I believe the best place for a captain is behind the stumps... the exact minute details and overview of every aspect of the game, including studying the batsmen, where the bowler is going wrong, looking at the intentions of the batsmen, which areas he is looking to score etc lies automatically in that position. As a kid while playing and captaining, I would always prefer to be behind the stump. And while not captaining, somewhere in long off watching the birds.
An interesting perspective Scorpi, but unlike other fielding positions, wicketkeeping is the most demanding - because of tehc onstant squat and because the focus levels are higher for a more sustained period of time.
Add captaincy to the mix and batting and Dhoni will be missing more games than he will be playing :)..
Cheers,
Do visit me sometimes too :)
Buzzz,
I have you on my blog reader...
Cheers,
Homer - Sehwag is too laboured as a captain. 4 days or 40 overs, it's tedious, almost tiring to watch him captain. As 3D skipper, most of his moves were way off. reckon as a player and person, he's totally at odds with the demands of leadership. To me, he’s neither a follower, nor a leader. One of those guys who are best doing their own thing.
Flip side: If he continues to evolve as a cricketer, becomes more selfish, and even more mercenary as a batsman, he could evolve as a thinker, maybe even as a captain. Unlikely, but stranger things have happened.
MSD as test skipper – that’s a tougher one to call. But if he does captain in tests, don’t put it beyond MSD, with time, to pull off a Sangakara. Play purely as a batsman. Ideally, Kumble staying test captain for at least the next 2-3 series suits MSD just fine. Score big test runs thru home series, up that average, and with time, become Ganguly’s replacement. Big Q, who will keep wickets then?
interesting perspective there Naked..
Sehwag had, during the IPL, shown streaks of genius coupled with the very mundane... I havent observed him much as captain but given the recent Md Nissar Trophy fiasco, I would categorize him in the Kumble mould of captaincy.
Keeping wickets can be Karthik's department.. But with Badri, Rohit and Raina knocking on the doors ( not to forget FIC Kaif), does Dhoni merit a place in the top 6?
It is a very interesting situation - one that will make the selectors earn their corn ( especiaqlly now that they are getting paid :) )
Cheers,
Post a Comment