Level 1
The Offences set out at 1.1 to 1.7 below are Level 1 Offences. The penalty for a Level 1 Offence shall be an official reprimand and/or a fine of up to the equivalent of 50% of the Player or Official’s match fee (as determined in accordance with sections I (3) and I (4).
1.1 Breach of the Logo Policy save for breaches relating to a commercial logo or player’s bat logo as defined therein
1.2 Abuse of cricket equipment or clothing, ground equipment or fixtures and fittings
1.3 Showing dissent at an umpire’s decision.
1.4 Using language that is obscene, offensive or insulting and/or the making of an obscene gesture
1.5 Excessive appealing
ICC CODE OF CONDUCT FOR PLAYERS & TEAM OFFICIALS
E65A97
7
1.6 Pointing or gesturing towards the pavilion in an aggressive manner by a bowler or other member of the fielding side upon the dismissal of a batsman.
1.7 Public criticism of, or inappropriate comment on a match related incident or match official.
----
"If we bowl them out and get a healthy lead we're still in this series."
---In a third hearing, Stuart Broad was cleared of any misconduct after Hurst ruled that comments made by Broad about the match officials were not derogatory.
--Here are Soulberry.And Samir.
8 comments:
"Proven not to be an accurate quote."
Surely that's relevant, although I'd like to know which quotes are or aren't accurate.
In any case, this just shows up the crazy situation the ICC has engineered at the moment. If you can stop and make a signal asking the umpire to have a decision reviewed on the pitch, how can there even be a charge for saying you thought it was worth a review at the end of the day?
Jonathan,
This, from Cricinfo
"There's frustration in that we bowled well as a unit and kept our disciplines on what's a really flat wicket," Stuart Broad said. "It was quite a frustrating day, with quite a few chances not going to hand and landing short, and a few poor umpiring decisions, but it's one of those days. Hopefully tomorrow we can come in and hit them hard before lunch and knock them over."
and this too
Broad's temper
Broad got more and more frustrated. He tried to mix things up, but the tipping point for him was when a bouncer to Brendan Nash was called wide by Daryl Harper. Broad, a feisty competitor at the best of times, couldn't bite his tongue and had a few words to say about it. At the end of the over he was less than impressed as he took his cap from Harper, who had a few words about calming down, so much so that Andrew Strauss was called in. The captain took his bowler away, gave him a pat on the back and promptly removed him from the attack.
Looks like dissent to me :).
But the point is taken - the ICC is hell bent on undermining its own institutions... More power to the ICC.
Cheers,
A certain set of players can actually get away with telling the umpire "that's bullshit and you know it". "Broady", that cute kid, was an angel in comparison.
I can bet an Indian player would have suffered - at the senior "Broady's" hands.
Or maybe I am just paranoid.
Naresh,
Par for course :)
Cheers,
Thanks for the linking up mate.
Total Ishtyle that from ICC.
Cheers SB :)
HOmer, wonder why you dont get comments on such posts beyond the usual Soulberry, me and Samir. Jonathan tries hard to play devil's advocate. Some other poeple who preach peace and fairness dont even talk about these - wonder why.
Anonymous,
The beauty of free speech, free expression and the right of choice - so no, I dont wonder why the comments on such posts are limited to a select group of people.
I am content with the level of debate on the blog.
Basically because it is a debate and not an all out flaming war :)
Thanks for your comments and welcome to the blog.
Cheers,
Post a Comment