Monday, July 23, 2007

Rain denies England deserved win

saye the banner on the CricInfo site.

The live scorecard reads thus

6.20 pm Well that's it. The match has been called off. England have been denied by the rain, India have been let off the hook, it's a draw. Lots of relieved faces in the Indian dressing room. There'll be several frustrated ones in England's for sure.
Hello??

Denied? Is victory some god given right that the Poms were deprived of?

Everyone, his uncle and his grandfather knew that rain will be a factor in this test match.

Everyone, his uncle and his grandfather knew that rain will become a significant factor on the last day.

And yet, Vaughan did not declare to give his bowlers that extra half an hour to have a go at the Indians.

In the morning session, the Pom over rate was 13.4 overs/hr. Hello?

There was a test match to be won. The Poms dragged their feet. They did not push hard enough.

They were not denied.

They got the result they deserved.

19 comments:

Prabu said...

Exactly Homer. If India did the same thing, the headlines would have screamed "England escape" and "India cannot finish it off". Bloody Cricinfo...

Homer said...

Prabu,

More than CricInfo, it would be us who would berate the team.

Look out for the Indian newspapers tomorrow and check how negative they are about this result.

Damned if we do, damned if we dont.

Samir Chopra said...

"Deserved" is the wrong word; no one deserves wins unless they get them.

Anonymous said...

But why blame the media.. look at the reactions of the 2 captains.. says it all doesn't it

Homer said...

Samir,

I agree completely.

Cheers

Homer said...

Rahul,

Rahul is not given to cussedness.. Fact of the matter is, England has more to rue on missed opportunities than India.

And thats a pretty good place from where to start the second test :)

Cheers

Samir Chopra said...

Actually, come to think of it, England had 96 overs in which to do the job. If someone had said to me, "here, you have 96 overs in which to bowl a team out as they chase 380", I'd have said it was a fair deal.

Also, I suspect India=relieved and England=frustrated is a better mix to take into the next match :)

Cheers,
Samir

Homer said...

Samir,

And with three days between Tests, we will carry the confidence without pondering too much about the negatives..

btw, I am having a little tete a tete with the Poms here and thus far, none of the Poms have clearly identified the reasons for England to feel good going into the Second Test and India feeling terrible..

Cheers :)

Anonymous said...

well the poms have some problems ahead.. they have kp and no one else.. their bowling isn't really going to bother anyone on a gud batting track.. their middle oda is a real problem.. and I wud be worried if I were Vaughan

Anonymous said...

I have to ask this qustion? what is our captain's record on winning tosses.. we always semm to lose them

Anonymous said...

dna had an article the other day about indias closest survivals.. 3 or 4 matches out of them said India had a cha nce to win the match at one point in time.. 3 of the matches needed 8-10 runs to win with 2 in hand.. now even with OUR tail, can anyone say this was a match we saved? come on for god's sake..
I had a big argument with one of the cricinfo guys on a column which said that India's victory over the WI in 1983 was a one of the major surprises in cricket history.. imagine it was an indian writing this.. and aqlso rememebr we had beaten the WI in the earlier stages

Homer said...

Rahul,

Check out Dileep Premachandran's column in the Times.

And to think we haven't lost the match or the series..

There is an air of negativity in the Indian media.. or maybe being negative sells more ad spots and more newspapers :)

Anonymous said...

homer

and which part of dileep premchandran's column you are not agreeing with???

he put it rightly that "For most Indians it is akin to taking a bulldozer to the Taj Mahal"

why we don't have courage to see what is coming much like ostrich...

that they are not turning younger by the day...

that we have made openers out of middle order (viru is the case and most recently DK) so that "middle" order is not touched...its their fortune and some luck that they have succeeded other we would have wrote their obituaries by now...

why cant they be touched...

its high time that start blooding in some youngsters in "middle order" otherwise there will suddenly be vacuum with nobody to look upto...

youngsters will provide some fresh approach, purpose, intent and hunger to prove themselves...DK, RP, SS, MSD are case in point who for all their deficiencies are showing guts to fight it out but same can not be said about our "seniors"...

where MSD for all its fallouts can save a match but the ones with collective exp of 40k runs dabs and dribble...

Homer said...

All of it actually straight point. And the reason I disagree with his article is because it is premised on sentiment rather than fact.

When Sachin was recovering from his elbow surgery and Ganguly was in the wilderness and Laxman out of favour, how many middle order batsmen were tried?

And how many persisted with? And for what reasons were they not persisted with?

The reality is this - despite being in the sunsets of their respective careers, Rahul, VVS, Sachin and Saurav bring a lot more to the table than their replacements.

Manoj Tiwary, Suresh Raina and Rohit Sharma,the names Mr Premachandran suggests, have a total test match experience equaling - 0.
Good luck bringing them together in a test match scenario.

India needs to handle its middle order better. Like getting Yuvraj in for Ganguly as he is complaining of back spasms.A test here, a couple of tests there, growing into understanding the role required of a number 5 - thats how I would like the transition to be handled.

Not some wrecking ball analogy which plays well with the hoi polloi but is fundamentally stupid.

Cheers.

PS:-

Rahul Dravid has 1*50 and 1*100 in his last 5 tests.(Avg 32.77)
Sachin Tendulkar has 2*50 and 2*100 in his last 5 tests.(Avg 56.0)
VVS Laxman hs 2*50 in his last 5 tests (Avg 29.77)
Saurav Ganguly has 1*50 and 1*100 in his last 5 tests.(Avg 37.77)

It is also obvious that Rahul Dravid has neither come to grips with the captaincy or evolved to be a good captain over the 2 odd years that he has been at the helm.

And yet

"India’s famous quartet, Dravid apart, have been living on reputation."

Anonymous said...

the stats are like skirt of a lady what they reveal is interesting but what they hide is more interesting...famously said once by sidhu

please exclude centuries/ half centuries against bangladesh and you will really find the difference..,

i read it somewhere that its only dravids whose aggregate jumps to 44 something...despite his failures against SA...

you said that our next generation test match experience is 0...

well i did not expected this joke from you...for obvious reasons...

cheers....

Homer said...

straight point,

You tell me if this whole wrecking ball argument makes any sense at all.
Especially when the options offered have yet to play a single Test between them.

Agree completely that stats dont tell the entire picture, but if an assertion is made that "India’s famous quartet, Dravid apart, have been living on reputation." then there has to be some data to back that assertion. And yet, Dravid's innings in Rawalpindi and Adelaide are bandied about to somehow justify the above assertion.

Thing is, England did not declare in the 3rd innings despite having a lead of 350 because of India's batting reputation. Thing also is that despite the Fab 4 aging, they English remain wary.

We need to phase out the Fab 4 over a period of time. Dumping the all at once, as suggested by Mr Premachandran, will push our cricket back for a long long time.

Anonymous said...

homer

i think when someone says that we needed some change i dont know why it is interpreted as the wholesale change of all four...

thats not the case mate!!

all one saying is that as you put it easing out our seniors much like aussies way coz they have experienced the same problem...they could come out of it coz they had systems in place...and we dont enjoy the same luxury (yes common sense is at premium in BCCI days!!!)

if we dont have to face the same problem of mass retirements then we have to ease out them and its no better time than now coz who ever comes in will have comfort of looking to some one for guidance...can learn a lot just by sharing same dressing room with them...

thats the way IMHO....

Homer said...

I agree with every word u say straight point. I had posted on this right after the World Cup.

My issue is with the tone and tenor of Mr Premachandran's article and the hysteria generated because of one supposed no show by the Fab 4.

Homer said...

straight point,

Here is the post