Friday, July 27, 2007

Test 2 Day 1- Advantage India

England 169/7

India did two things right on the first day- won the toss and elected to field.

From that point on, it was just a question of not trying too much, keeping the ball there and thereabouts and letting the conditions do the rest. And the Indian bowlers, barring RP Singh to some extent, did just that.

Couple of things that made no sense

  1. The persistence with Ganguly for a prolonged spell post tea. And then replacing him with Sachin Tendulkar with two new batsmen at the crease.
  2. The tendency of the Indian bowlers and fielders to lose the plot somewhat in the last half and hour before tea. England was under the cosh. India needed to keep the pressure up by stemming the flow of runs and letting the pressure get to Collingwood and Cook. Instead, we had a flurry of fours and a 44 run partnership was conjured up in double quick time.
So, going into Day 2, India holds three of the four aces. The first task for India is to wrap up the tail in the first hour while restricting the score to below 200.

200 and upwards is a huge psychological boost for the English team, given their travails today. And India will do well to deny England any crumbs of comfort.

Which means that India show positive intent with the bat. English commentators have not stopped reminding is that this is a second string bowling attack and just how wonderfully they performed in spite of being a second string bowling line up.

Now is the time and the opportunity to remind them why exactly this bowling line up is not considered England's first choice bowling attack.

India needs to be relentless with the bat, despite loss of wickets.

Forget the Fab 4 or Famous 5 or Secret Seven or whatever else the hype meisters call them, India needs to overhaul England's first innings total as quickly as possible. And the reason for this is that with every run that India scores, England shifts to damage limitation/damage control mode.

And if England cannot attack the Indian batsmen, the English bowling becomes less potent. And that opens up the possibility for India to target Madhusuden Panesar for sustained periods in this game.

Which in turn sets the platform the remaining Test and ODIs to follow.

And if conditions get more batsmen friendly, as they are supposed to on Days 2 and 3, India's batsmen have a huge advantage to do just that.

England played to India's batting reputation in the first test in spite of bowling friendly conditions. This is the time to remind them exactly why India's batting has the reputation in the first place.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Chandan said...

If the conditions are anything similar to what they were yesterday, it'll be difficult of Indian batsmen too. English bowler are wonderful swing bowlers too.

So let us not have the expectations set that high! Everyone is talking that India should take a lead of 100-150 runs, as if it is just there in the basket which anyone can pick, especially Indian batsmen!

I wouldn't have any such unrealistic expectation!

Anonymous said...

homer
most of blogs and commentators are praising dravid captaincy (not directed at you)...

we are like see saw...

one day dravid's captaincy is described as very safe other dat proactive and reactive another day...

but the reality is that when bowlers bowls as good as this and batsmen (hopefully) scores 400 consistently even captain like dravid looks good...

kumble should have been given more attacking fielders to put pressure on tailenders

i agree that england will feel competitive if they score 200 or above...which is also the reflection of how high they rate our batsmen...

samir said...

Aha, what a sweet feeling to see England 198 all out and India 102-0 on waking up!

Homer said...

straight point,

There were two passages of play that I found bizarre. One was the pre tea session where we leaked runs like they were going out of fashion. The other was the 7 over spell that Saurav bowled, followed immediately by Tendulkar.

The first cannot be blamed on Rahul. It kind of comes with the territory. Look at any Indian captain in the last 15 years and the story line remains the same.

The second was plain bad captaincy in my opinion. With Ian Bell and Matt Prior at the crease, starting at 0, why would you not get your frontline bowlers in?