Remember this
committee meetings but stopped short of denying reports of differences with the national selectors.
Then there was this bit on the Fake IPL Player's blog
Then there was this
Then, here are the teams selected between Nov 23, 2008 and todayOnce the team had assembled, captain MS Dhoni read out a statement to "the people of India and Indian cricket fans worldwide". The team, he said, was unified, "as good as it has ever been with each individual supporting each other on and off the field". He called the reports, published in the Indian media on Friday, of a rift between himself and Virender Sehwag "false and irresponsible behaviour".
India in Sri Lanka ODI Series, 2008/09
Only T20I: Sri Lanka v India at Colombo (RPS), Feb 10, 2009
India in New Zealand T20I Series, 2008/09
India in New Zealand ODI Series, 2008/09
India in New Zealand Test Series, 2008/09
ICC World Twenty20, 2009
India tour of West Indies, 2009
And now, the 30 probables for the Champions Trophy.
Is there a case that the selectors have been biding their time to get even with Dhoni for his remarks and, post the T20 debacle, they have the carte blanche to do exactly that? I believe there is.
Looking at the teams selected in the period between the spat and now, while the core has remained more or less stable, the fringe selections have more than raised an eyebrow. While each can be explained away in isolation, taken in toto, there is neither continuity nor is there a game plan. More and more, it appears to me as if the selectors have decided to limit MSD's choices.
And then there is the Sehwag injury and the subsequent nonsense. Till date, no selector has stepped forward to state that the selection was made in good faith because they did not believe the injury to be serious enough ( despite Sehwag missing a few IPL games owing to a different injury). And when the shit hit the ceiling, it was left to MSD to salvage the situation.
I also think that the selectors are over playing their hand - a team can only lose so much before public opinion turns against it. And while that may be a good enough reason to get rid of MSD, the greater problem of inflicting the team with self doubt and losing its ability to win will be detrimental to the selectors.
And with Gary Kirsten's contract coming to an end this season, there is only so much turmoil the team can take (if indeed he decides not to continue).
The Empire may be striking back, but are the selectors chopping their noses to spite their face?
7 comments:
Homer, take it this is your birthday gift to MS. Good one.
Its his birthday NC? I had no idea..
Cheers,
Do swing by Bored.
Gary Kirsten would continue as India coach.
Good point on the fringe selection - each can be explained away.
But honestly, they would not be 'trying to get rid' of MSD. Perhaps as FIP suggested, just rein him a bit here and there. I mean their job is to select a winning team, and despite the WC reverse, the team has been winning largely and it follows they have been doing their job and doing it well at that.
Also /* Till date, no selector ..*/
Well, I would think it was obvious they made it in good faith. If they had an idea that Viru was a non-starter, he would not have been in the squad in the first place. Or am I giving too much credit to the wise-men here :)
LI,
Why should the selectors want to cramp Dhoni when he is delivering what everyone wants?
If they have issues with Dhoni the batsman or Dhoni the keeper, drop him on those grounds.. But why tie Dhoni's the captain's behind his back and expect him to lead the charge?
Cheers,
Sam,
Dont forget that both parties should want it for Kirsten to continue.
Cheers,
Post a Comment